Sunday, December 29, 2019

How to Create and Use DLLs in Delphi

A Dynamic Link Library (DLL) is a collection of routines (small programs) that that can be called by applications and other DLLs. Like units, they contain code or resources that can be shared between multiple applications. The concept of DLLs is the core of the Windows architectural design, and for the most part, Windows is simply a collection of DLLs. With Delphi, you can write and use your own DLLs and even call functions regardless of whether or not they were developed with other systems or developers, like Visual Basic, or C/C. Creating a Dynamic Link Library The following few lines will demonstrate how to create a simple DLL using Delphi. For the beginning start Delphi and navigate to File New DLL to build a new DLL template. Select the default text and replace it with this: library TestLibrary;uses SysUtils, Classes, Dialogs;procedure DllMessage; export;begin ShowMessage(Hello world from a Delphi DLL) ; end;exports DllMessage;beginend. If you look at the project file of any Delphi application, you’ll see that it starts with the reserved word program. By contrast, DLLs always start with library and then a uses clause for any units. In this example, the DllMessage procedure follows, which doesnt do anything but show a simple message. At the end of the source code is an exports statement which lists the routines that are actually exported from the DLL in a way that they can be called by another application. What this means is that you can have, say, five procedures in a DLL and only two of them (listed in the exports section) can be called from an external program (the remaining three are sub procedures). In order to use this DLL, we have to compile it by pressing CtrlF9. This should create a DLL called SimpleMessageDLL.DLL in your projects folder. Finally, lets take a look at how to call the DllMessage procedure from a statically loaded DLL. To import a procedure contained in a DLL, you can use the keyword external in the procedure declaration. For example, given the DllMessage procedure shown above, the declaration in the calling application would look like this: procedure DllMessage; external SimpleMessageDLL.dll The actual call to a procedure is nothing more than: DllMessage; The entire code for a Delphi form (name: Form1), with a TButton (named Button1) that calls the DLLMessage function, looks something like this: unit Unit1;interface uses Windows, Messages, SysUtils, Variants, Classes, Graphics, Controls, Forms, Dialogs, StdCtrls; type TForm1 class(TForm) Button1: TButton; procedure Button1Click(Sender: TObject) ;private{ Private declarations }public{ Public declarations }end;var Form1: TForm1; procedure DllMessage; external SimpleMessageDLL.dllimplementation {$R *.dfm} procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject) ;begin DllMessage; end;end.

Saturday, December 21, 2019

The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki - 2336 Words

THESIS STATEMENT Despite criticisms, President Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the lesser of many evils, sparing more lives in the long term by avoiding continued conflict. PURPOSE STATEMENT Through historical research and sociological analysis, it will be proven that the atomic bombs were the best possible strategy to save lives and bring a speedy end to the war in the Pacific. INTRODUCTION On August 6, 1945 the culmination of years of scientific research and testing was released on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The fiery explosion that discharged from the atomic bomb killed tens of thousands instantly. When no word of surrender was uttered by the Japanese leadership, another atomic weapon was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9. Although less lethal than the first, thousands still perished in the Japanese city. â€Å"The Japanese leaders [understood] the utter hopelessness of their position† (Groves 319), and the next day they announced Japan’s unconditional surrender to the Allied forces. This capitulation finally saw the conclusion of almost four years of warring in the Pacific. Thousands of Allied soldiers poised to invade the Asian country cheered with relief, knowing their lives had been spared. Meanwhile, half a world away, few Americans opposed the use of the atomic bomb, knowing it was a necessary evil. As years passed, though, the controversy surr ounding the bombings grew. Corrupt leadership, Cold War experiences,Show MoreRelatedAtomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki844 Words   |  4 Pagesdropped atomic bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing nearly 200,000 people. This resulted in Japans surrender in World War II. J. Samuel Walker analyzes this historical event in his book Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs. Over the past 70 years’ extensive research has been conducted and there is an understanding that Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs is inconclusive. It is impossible to determine that the use of the bomb was the quickestRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1302 Words   |  6 PagesAllies almost one week after being hit with two atomic bombs. On August 6, 1945 during World War II an American B-29 bomber dropped the world s first deployed atomic bomb over the Japanese city Hiroshima, wiping out 90 percent of the city and killing 80,000 people immediately. Three days later a second B-29 dropped another atomic bomb on the Japanese city Nagasaki, killing around 40,000 people. (The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) The Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings were necessary because it played aRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki884 Words   |  4 PagesFearful cries spread through the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the atomic bombs were dropped. Thousands of people were killed instantly, with the rest left critically injured. Eventually, it was measured that 135,000 people were killed as a result of these bombs. We know that many people were killed. But how and why were the atomic bombs created? Who decided to use them? These questions all contribute to the fact that the atomic bombs impacted the world greatly. It all started when WorldRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay1776 Words   |  8 PagesThe use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II was a controversial decision that was made by President Truman. On August 6, 1945, President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and three days later a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. It brought an end to the bloody war in the Pacific after 4 years. Making Japan surrender in the face of unimaginable force and significant destruction on Japan’s soil. Nevertheless, Truman’s decisionRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1515 Words   |  7 PagesResearch Question: Was it necessary for President Truman to drop the atomic bomb in Japan? Was it necessary for Truman to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II? On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US aircraft on Hiroshima. This atomic bomb was dropped to force Japan into surrender, this bomb alone destroyed Hiroshima and over 90,000 people were instantly killed in the explosion and an additional 100,000 people perished from burns and radiation sickness. Japan refusedRead MoreThe Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1764 Words   |  8 Pagesmake the decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki however, President Truman was ultimately the man who made the final decision to launch ‘Little Boy’ and destroy Hiroshima, Nagasaki and their civilians, thus forcing an end to the war. Although there were many alternatives presented to President Truman, it is unknown as to whether they would have actually succeeded in ending the war or producing less casualties. Truman made the decision to drop these bombs in the heat of war but h is justificationRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1364 Words   |  6 PagesOn the 6th of August 1945 America dropped the atomic bomb by the name of ‘Little Boy’ dropped by the plane ‘Enola Gay’ on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. Three days later on the 9th of August America dropped another bombed called, ‘Fat Man’ on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. A surrender was received and accepted by America on the 15th of August and the war against Japan had ended. Harry S. Truman, the man responsible for dropping the bombs claims it ended the war more efficiently and was in fact theRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay1570 Words   |  7 PagesDespite the extreme devastation, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. The atomic bomb is a weapon unmatched in warfare, rapidly releasing nuclear energy by fission of atomic nuclei. Desperate times call for desperate measures, which is why America chose to unleash its most deadly weapon, the atomic bomb, on Japan. America, who had already fought in World War II for over four years, had no desire to perpetuate the war. When Japan refused to surrender, America was leftRead MoreAtomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1074 Words   |  5 PagesThere are many different ways in which WWII could have ended. Rather than taking the risk of dropping atomic bombs on Japan, many people believe that one of the alternative options would have been much more sensible. The variety of possible options the U.S. could have taken to finish the war have been analyzed for years. Though Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki is one of the most controversial and debated topics in history, this researcher believes that he madeRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1998 Words   |  8 Pagesto drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Joon Jung 2/21/16 Word Count: 1848 Section A: Identification and Evaluation of Sources Research Question: Was it necessary for President Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Was it necessary for Truman to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II? On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US aircraft on Hiroshima. This atomic bomb was dropped to force Japan into surrender, this bomb alone destroyed

Friday, December 13, 2019

Limit Free Essays

Q1. What is the difference between a left neighborhood and a right neighborhood of a number? How does this concept become relevant in determining a limit of a function? Answer: Left neighborhood of a number ‘a’ represents numbers lesser than the number ‘a’ and is denoted by ‘a-’ or ‘a-d’, where d is infinitesimally small. Similarly, right neighborhood of a number ‘a’ represents numbers greater than the number ‘a’ and is denoted by ‘a+’ or or ‘a+d’, where d is infinitesimally small. We will write a custom essay sample on Limit or any similar topic only for you Order Now This concept is very important in determining limit of a function. A function f(x) of ‘x’ will have a limit at x = a; if and only if f(a-d) = f(a+d) = f(a); where d is infinitesimally small. Q2. A limit of a function at a point of discontinuity does not exist. Why? Give an example. Answer: For existence of limit of function f(x) of ‘x’; at x = a; the necessary and sufficient condition is f(a-d) = f(a+d) = f(a); where d is infinitesimally small. At a point of discontinuity, f(a-d) ≠  f(a+d). Therefore, limit of a function does not exist at a point of discontinuity. The following example will make it clear. Let us take example of integer function. This function is defined in the following manner: f(x) = a;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   where ‘a’ is an integer less than or equal to x. Let us check if limit exists for this function at x = ‘a’, where ‘a’ is an integer. Now left hand side limit = f(a-d) = a-1 And right hand side limit = f(a+d) = a Thus, f(a-d) ≠  f(a+d); and hence limit does not exists for this function. If this function is plotted, there is discontinuity at all integer points. Thus it can be seen that limit of a function does not exist at a point of discontinuity. 3. What is the difference between a derivative of a function and its slope? Give a detailed explanation. Answer: Derivative of a function is another function, which remains same throughout the domain of the function at all the points. Slope of a function on the other hand is the value of the derivative. This value may change from point to point depending on the nature of the function. Let us take an example. Derivative of Sin(x) is Cos(x) for all values of ‘x’. If one looks at the slope of Sin(x), its value keeps changing in [-1, +1] range from point to point. Slope of Sin(x) is -1 for x = odd integral multiples of p; +1 for x = even multiples of p and 0 for x = odd multiples of p/2. Thus, it can be seen that while derivative of a function remains the same while its slope could be changing from point to point. How to cite Limit, Essay examples

Thursday, December 5, 2019

American History Essay Sample free essay sample

Introduction The westbound motion by the different subdivisions of the American society was motivated by different push and pull factors. For the husbandmans. the good dirts of the western frontier pulled them towards the West. while for the land-hungry Virginians. this hungriness drove them down the rivers into Carolina. For the people in Massachusetts. the hunt for new dirts took them towards Pennsylvania and New York. As for the ranchers. it is the enticement of the grass that took them west. For whatever ground the people moved west. the Westward enlargement was really of import in the economic history of the United States. ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com ) The west ward enlargement was accelerated by the Louisiana Purchase. which saw America get land towards the West of its district from France. The purchase of Louisiana had a pronounced impact on the size of the United States. In buying Louisiana. with a entire country of 828. We will write a custom essay sample on American History Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page 000 square stat mis. America about doubled its land mass. Furthermore. Louisiana was endowed with legion natural resources that greatly increased the wealth of the United States. . ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com ) Immigration The in-migration to the United States reached its extremum in the period between 1940 and 1920. This clip saw the reaching of some about 37 million immigrants. The records indicate that at the clip. about 6 million Germans. 4. 5 million Irish. and 4. 75 Italians came. In add-on. during the same period. 4. 2 million people from England. Scotland and Wales streamed in. as a similar figure from the Austro-Hungarian Empire set in. This was non all. some 2. 3 million Scandinavians and 3. 3 million Russians were besides to follow. This drastically changed the demographics of the United States. for illustration. in 1840. the population increased from 550. 000 to 1. 8 million as a consequence of the in-migration. In the major metropoliss. by 1910. and over half of the population was made up of immigrants and their households. . ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com ) The immigrants provided inexpensive labour for the industries and constituted the chief work force in the steel Millss. meat packing workss. and the garment trade. In Milwaukee. the population increased drastically between 1850 and 1890. with big Numberss of Polish and Eastern European immigrants found working in turn overing Millss and blast furnaces. . ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com ) Most of the immigrants retained their national individualities in footings of faith. civilization. and celebrated their cultural vacations ; which provoked anti- immigrant sentiments among the indigens. In the West seashore. Chinese immigrants flocked in big Numberss. motivating Congress to go through the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882. In the 1890s. Congress passed other statute law to stem the inflow of polygamists. contract labourers and people with diseases. Some local groups such as the American Protective Association of 1887 urged for limitations on in-migration. . ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com ) However. it is during this period that the United States became an industrial human dynamo. taking in meatpacking. timber production. and steel production. in add-on to gold. Ag and coal excavation. The state was to see a roar in the industrial growing and graduated table of production. . ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com ) Regional Differences and Sectionalism Each part of the United States developed different societal and economic systems. The North was sing the Market Revolution whereby most economic activities were based on commercial agribusiness and the growing of metropoliss and industry. It was bring forthing merchandises like fabrics and vesture. lumber and machinery. On the other manus. the South remained tied to plantation agribusiness that depended on slave labour and international markets. ( Littlefield. Douglas R. 1983 ) Following the developments and regional differences experienced by different parts of the United States. many Americans remained divided along regional. cultural and category lines. The Southerners were increasing their dependance on slave labour. particularly with the rise in the cotton civilization. The adult females in the South remained disfranchised. many Americans were get downing to happen themselves among the turning figure of landless pay labourers. and with the in-migration. cultural and spiritual differences started to emerge. Sectionalism became the cardinal factor in discouraging where substructure like roads and canals would be built. The struggles were non merely geographical in nature. but besides took another dimension. characterized by switching aversions among assorted urban and rural involvements. ( Mark M. S. . 2001 ) The patricians and the new middle class were united in their sentiment about the Northern laboring categories. every bit good as their unfavorable judgment of the slave keeping south part. The northern elite on the other manus. consisting of the blue Boston Brahmins and the reform minded emancipationists and capitalists believed in the virtuousnesss of breeding and highbrow civilization. To them. the handiness of free labour and virtuous political democracy were most of import. ( Mark M. S. . 2001 ) However. the northern elite besides had some dissensions among themselves. and this was apparent in the political propensities. In general nevertheless. the Northerners were of the strong belief that bondage posed a grave danger to the hereafter of the United States. In the South. the southern elites were besides of assorted kinds. The industrialists. merchandisers and the urban in-between category were united in their resistance to the more influential plantation owner category. ( Mark M. S. . 2001 ) In the terminal. following the northern unfavorable judgment of the south’s bondage policy. the Southerners were forced to hold. since they were linked through their involvements and affinity in back uping the bondage. As such. bondage was a coalescent force for the South. and helped to cement provincialism ( Littlefield. Douglas R. 1983 ) The North wanted a protectionist policy that would protect their commercial involvements and preferred a countrywide trade policy that would function their involvements. The South on the other manus cared small about protectionist policies against foreign bearers and alternatively preferred as many transportation options as possible. This put a strain on the nation’s foreign policy because of the different involvements. Decision The events of the 19ThursdayCentury America saw the turning point in American history. with the immense addition in the population occasioned by the immense in-migration. the Industrial Revolution. and the provincialism that was to subsequently emerge as a consequence of the regional differences in footings of economic system. Up to now. the differences are yet to be to the full resolved. The westbound enlargement opened up America to new chances that helped in the growing of their economic system. The in-migration has shaped America as the land of diverseness of civilizations and political orientations. which have been merged to organize one state. Mentions hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Britannica. com: Accessed on 13ThursdayDecember 2007 Littlefield. Douglas R. ( 1983 ) â€Å"Maryland Sectionalism and the Development of the Potomac Route to the West. 1768-1826. † The Maryland Historian 14: pp 31-52 Mark M. S. ( 2001 ) â€Å"Listening to Nineteenth-Century America† University of North Carolina Press